<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Didn&#8217;t This Happen Three Years Ago?!?!!!!</title>
	<link>http://www.liberalangst.com/2007/11/17/why-didnt-this-happen-three-years-ago/</link>
	<description>If you're not irate, you're not paying attention.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: GleefulNihilism</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalangst.com/2007/11/17/why-didnt-this-happen-three-years-ago/#comment-342</link>
		<author>GleefulNihilism</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.liberalangst.com/2007/11/17/why-didnt-this-happen-three-years-ago/#comment-342</guid>
					<description>He's waiting till now?

What a great idea, gives me an extra 3 years to finish my dissertation after I graduate.

And for the record, I can read that sentence without craving Lucky Charms, but only because I hated Lucky Charms. The marshmellows made me gag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s waiting till now?</p>
<p>What a great idea, gives me an extra 3 years to finish my dissertation after I graduate.</p>
<p>And for the record, I can read that sentence without craving Lucky Charms, but only because I hated Lucky Charms. The marshmellows made me gag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reynard</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalangst.com/2007/11/17/why-didnt-this-happen-three-years-ago/#comment-356</link>
		<author>Reynard</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.liberalangst.com/2007/11/17/why-didnt-this-happen-three-years-ago/#comment-356</guid>
					<description>Democrats have a bad habit of not responding to Oppo*/Swiftboating. (Remember the Willie Horton ads?) I suppose that they don't want to be seen as "sinking to their (the Republican's) level". Unfortunately, sinking to their level (or lower, as Karl Rove has done time after time) *works!* It's an *effective* means of getting voters to, if not *like* your guy, at least *dislike* the other guy enough to *vote for* your guy -- although, admittedly, at the risk of making voters cynical about both of the candidates *and* the process itself.  Use it if you must, but use it with care...

*Opposition Research</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats have a bad habit of not responding to Oppo*/Swiftboating. (Remember the Willie Horton ads?) I suppose that they don&#8217;t want to be seen as &#8220;sinking to their (the Republican&#8217;s) level&#8221;. Unfortunately, sinking to their level (or lower, as Karl Rove has done time after time) *works!* It&#8217;s an *effective* means of getting voters to, if not *like* your guy, at least *dislike* the other guy enough to *vote for* your guy &#8212; although, admittedly, at the risk of making voters cynical about both of the candidates *and* the process itself.  Use it if you must, but use it with care&#8230;</p>
<p>*Opposition Research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
